Loop Engineering: Turning Recurring Work Into Self-Correcting Loops
We built a loop-orchestration layer on top of our agent mesh: recurring workflows that verify their own output against evidence, learn from corrections, and keep the human on the authority path rather than the execution path. The hard part was not the automation — it was making verification enforced rather than assumed, and making the learning layer gated rather than runaway. We validated the design against three independent adversarial reviews before it stood — and two days later it runs: a 1,600-line runner with 23 passing tests, the first loop registered on our live cron fleet in supervised pilot, and the kill-switch already proven in a live halt.
Why this matters
This is the pattern behind most "autonomous agent" claims, made safe. The insight generalises beyond our stack: any team running agents on recurring work can ask the same three questions — what is the memory, what actually triggers a run, and how do you verify the output against evidence, enforced rather than assumed? Get those right and the human's job becomes supervision. Get them wrong and you have a faster way to ship mistakes.